[DiscordArchive] So displayid = 8176 and done?
[DiscordArchive] So displayid = 8176 and done?
Original source
Transports, etc
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:08 PM #11Archived author: Meji • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:08:16.585000+00:00
Original source
Transports, etc
Original source
So what's the actual issue in the end? Why we get DisplayID = 0 from sniffer is that correct in the first place? How should that be handled by the Core? For now the Core just ignores any GOBJ that has DisplayID = 0 and they don't get even sent to the client, from what Shauren is saying
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:08 PM #12Archived author: ZaDarkSide • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:08:27.138000+00:00
Original source
So what's the actual issue in the end? Why we get DisplayID = 0 from sniffer is that correct in the first place? How should that be handled by the Core? For now the Core just ignores any GOBJ that has DisplayID = 0 and they don't get even sent to the client, from what Shauren is saying
Original source
Go isn't sent to client
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:08 PM #13Archived author: Meji • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:08:44.437000+00:00
Original source
Go isn't sent to client
Original source
But maybe there are still gos that don't support displayid 0 (crashing the client)
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:09 PM #14Archived author: Meji • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:09:55.392000+00:00
Original source
But maybe there are still gos that don't support displayid 0 (crashing the client)
Original source
i'm certainly sure they dont have something like "only entry xy has displayid 0 allowed in client", but you can easily test it by just setting displayid to 0 in entire db and run thru orgrimmar or stormwind <:lul:740636120290689116>
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:09 PM #15Archived author: ModoX • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:09:59.754000+00:00
Original source
i'm certainly sure they dont have something like "only entry xy has displayid 0 allowed in client", but you can easily test it by just setting displayid to 0 in entire db and run thru orgrimmar or stormwind <:lul:740636120290689116>
Original source
they would be in a db2 file if it was implemented like that
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:11 PM #16Archived author: ZaDarkSide • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:11:13.263000+00:00
Original source
they would be in a db2 file if it was implemented like that
Original source
i’m sure that’s bound to the type too if it crashes or not
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:12 PM #17Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:12:52.599000+00:00
Original source
i’m sure that’s bound to the type too if it crashes or not
Original source
thats an argument, indeed
rektbyfaith
04-09-2023, 01:13 PM #18Archived author: ModoX • Posted: 2023-04-09T13:13:04.453000+00:00
Original source
thats an argument, indeed