[Archive] Possible Model Edit Fix for 2.3
[Archive] Possible Model Edit Fix for 2.3
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote:Ok here, this is my theory
If we open the 2.2 patch - and then EXTRACT the Signaturefile, we keep it somewhere until patch 2.3 goes live. We delete the Signaturefile in the 2.3 patch, then we pack the 2.3 signature file into the 2.3 patch - Still following?
Then if we use ModelEditLive for 2.2 it "should" still work as it bypasses 2.2 Signaturefile. I can't see anything wrong with this theory, unless warden now protects against old versions of files and automaticaly makes you download the new one. Warden never used to do that so I dont see why it should now, unless they are trying to do everything to fix this.
I'm not saying this is going to work as we can't test it right now because the PTR Patch isn't the final patch that is going to be released. We will just need to see, if anyone has any opinions / ideas on why this might not work. I want to know reasons this might not work as we need some way to fix this
Cheers -D-
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #1Archived author: Varu • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote:Ok here, this is my theory
If we open the 2.2 patch - and then EXTRACT the Signaturefile, we keep it somewhere until patch 2.3 goes live. We delete the Signaturefile in the 2.3 patch, then we pack the 2.3 signature file into the 2.3 patch - Still following?
Then if we use ModelEditLive for 2.2 it "should" still work as it bypasses 2.2 Signaturefile. I can't see anything wrong with this theory, unless warden now protects against old versions of files and automaticaly makes you download the new one. Warden never used to do that so I dont see why it should now, unless they are trying to do everything to fix this.
I'm not saying this is going to work as we can't test it right now because the PTR Patch isn't the final patch that is going to be released. We will just need to see, if anyone has any opinions / ideas on why this might not work. I want to know reasons this might not work as we need some way to fix this
Cheers -D-
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: signaturefiles are made of file-checksums. those checksums change everytime the files change ... the modeleditfix does nothing but just modifying some address in the ram where the solution of the check if the files is valid or not is stored. that offset to the adress changes everytime they recompile wow (aka every patch). so, using the 2.2 fix on 2.3 is just stupid. ****s it up, nothing more. i dont think i'll have to comment this more .. [one sentece: no, wont work, partly just bullshit.]
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #2Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: signaturefiles are made of file-checksums. those checksums change everytime the files change ... the modeleditfix does nothing but just modifying some address in the ram where the solution of the check if the files is valid or not is stored. that offset to the adress changes everytime they recompile wow (aka every patch). so, using the 2.2 fix on 2.3 is just stupid. ****s it up, nothing more. i dont think i'll have to comment this more .. [one sentece: no, wont work, partly just bullshit.]
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote:I think only Chaz know how to fix it...^^
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #3Archived author: Mudkip • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote:I think only Chaz know how to fix it...^^
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: no, and its fixed yet. by an other guy.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #4Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: no, and its fixed yet. by an other guy.
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote:*Sigh* I never said it was true just an opinion, and you never know it might work :O sometimes Blizz miss some things
And yeh Chazz does know but he said that the way he can do it would probally active warden to go physco on ur account
-D-
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #5Archived author: Varu • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote:*Sigh* I never said it was true just an opinion, and you never know it might work :O sometimes Blizz miss some things
And yeh Chazz does know but he said that the way he can do it would probally active warden to go physco on ur account
-D-
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: and i just said it was a wrong opinion. nothing more ... and it will not work. i bet everything against this. (like all the time someone wants to prove me wrong xD).
well ... there is an internal fix now. i am sure, it will not be released soon on here. (ztfx did, chz has afaik)
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #6Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: and i just said it was a wrong opinion. nothing more ... and it will not work. i bet everything against this. (like all the time someone wants to prove me wrong xD).
well ... there is an internal fix now. i am sure, it will not be released soon on here. (ztfx did, chz has afaik)
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote:One thing I can prove you wrong on.
Taken from Www.Dictionary.Com
o·pin·ion![[Image: premium.gif]](http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif)
/əˈpɪn
yən/Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-pin-yuh
–noun 1.a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. 2.a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
Since when was it possible to have a wrong opinion since opinions arent the truth they are just something someone thinks could be a possibility
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #7Archived author: Varu • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote:One thing I can prove you wrong on.
Taken from Www.Dictionary.Com
o·pin·ion
–noun 1.a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. 2.a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
Since when was it possible to have a wrong opinion since opinions arent the truth they are just something someone thinks could be a possibility
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: wow someone finally said something to schlumpf, and he always corrects me! and yea, this theory would not work.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #8Archived author: L'Lawliet • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: wow someone finally said something to schlumpf, and he always corrects me! and yea, this theory would not work.
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: i took opinion because you did. and i dont really read my shit ... it ... and saying i used the wrong word is not proving me wrong ... iÄ'm german ... thats just stupuid...
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #9Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: i took opinion because you did. and i dont really read my shit ... it ... and saying i used the wrong word is not proving me wrong ... iÄ'm german ... thats just stupuid...
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM
Original source
Quote: well its just that every sing time i post you always say its bad and you cant read shit of it.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:03 AM #10Archived author: L'Lawliet • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:03:33.867327
Original source
Quote: well its just that every sing time i post you always say its bad and you cant read shit of it.
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)