[DiscordArchive] beautiful, gplv2+?
[DiscordArchive] beautiful, gplv2+?
Original source
beautiful, gplv2+?
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 04:32 PM #1Archived author: IHM • Posted: 2025-08-07T16:32:46.821000+00:00
Original source
beautiful, gplv2+?
Original source
you'd have to check the repo license but probably
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 04:56 PM #2Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-08-07T16:56:24.599000+00:00
Original source
you'd have to check the repo license but probably
Original source
you can always explicitly grant permission (which is annoying because we would need to do it every time for license incompatible code)
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 04:57 PM #3Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-08-07T16:57:30.354000+00:00
Original source
you can always explicitly grant permission (which is annoying because we would need to do it every time for license incompatible code)
Original source
still looks like agpl v3 to me
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 04:57 PM #4Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-08-07T16:57:54.495000+00:00
Original source
still looks like agpl v3 to me
Original source
eh, it's a trivial enough change more less what i already said to, half is removing azerothcore hackfix xd
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:02 PM #5Archived author: IHM • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:02:36.815000+00:00
Original source
eh, it's a trivial enough change more less what i already said to, half is removing azerothcore hackfix xd
Original source
or you do an extra port just for us
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:02 PM #6Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:02:57.011000+00:00
Original source
or you do an extra port just for us
Original source
I find it quite rude to say that. Working with TC isn't exactly easy, classes tens of thousands long that have organically grown into god classes with little oversight. No modern programming principles followed. Undocumented and untested code.
I don't blame the maintainers. I don't blame anyone. People just have different interests and priorities in this niche genre.
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:06 PM #7Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:06:09.321000+00:00
Original source
I find it quite rude to say that. Working with TC isn't exactly easy, classes tens of thousands long that have organically grown into god classes with little oversight. No modern programming principles followed. Undocumented and untested code.
I don't blame the maintainers. I don't blame anyone. People just have different interests and priorities in this niche genre.
Original source
And apparently there are users who have interest in getting 335 updated. And doing things like boring paperwork such as collecting commits still is a contribution even if it only helps organizing the process
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:09 PM #8Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:09:01.010000+00:00
Original source
And apparently there are users who have interest in getting 335 updated. And doing things like boring paperwork such as collecting commits still is a contribution even if it only helps organizing the process
Original source
there is plenty of work to do, even for those who are unable or unwilling to invest time
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:09 PM #9Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:09:21.752000+00:00
Original source
there is plenty of work to do, even for those who are unable or unwilling to invest time
Original source
I don't disagree. I just don't think it's constructive to call people who don't actively work with the TC code base plebs. It's derogatory.
rektbyfaith
08-07-2025, 05:09 PM #10Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2025-08-07T17:09:45.344000+00:00
Original source
I don't disagree. I just don't think it's constructive to call people who don't actively work with the TC code base plebs. It's derogatory.
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)