[DiscordArchive] Performance wise would having 500 creatures with random movement stood in one spot each with setActi
[DiscordArchive] Performance wise would having 500 creatures with random movement stood in one spot each with setActi
Original source
Performance wise would having 500 creatures with random movement stood in one spot each with setActive on them be a rough analog for if 500 players were stood in that spot?
rektbyfaith
06-22-2025, 04:47 PM #1Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-06-22T16:47:13.991000+00:00
Original source
Performance wise would having 500 creatures with random movement stood in one spot each with setActive on them be a rough analog for if 500 players were stood in that spot?
Original source
not nearly
rektbyfaith
06-22-2025, 04:51 PM #2Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-06-22T16:51:45.392000+00:00
Original source
not nearly
Original source
players have the entire session/packet updating sitting on their shoulders as well
rektbyfaith
06-22-2025, 04:52 PM #3Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-06-22T16:52:14.609000+00:00
Original source
players have the entire session/packet updating sitting on their shoulders as well
Original source
Yeah true I hadn't considered that
rektbyfaith
06-22-2025, 04:54 PM #4Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-06-22T16:54:06.956000+00:00
Original source
Yeah true I hadn't considered that
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)