[DiscordArchive] Yeah but the victorious state procs on kills. So why wouldn't it proc from a victory rush kill?
[DiscordArchive] Yeah but the victorious state procs on kills. So why wouldn't it proc from a victory rush kill?
Original source
Yeah but the victorious state procs on kills. So why wouldn't it proc from a victory rush kill?
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:46 PM #1Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:46:55.102000+00:00
Original source
Yeah but the victorious state procs on kills. So why wouldn't it proc from a victory rush kill?
Original source
anyway
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:47 PM #2Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:47:37.419000+00:00
Original source
anyway
Original source
order of procs (from the same proc call) is unspecified (in practice ordered by spell id but thats impl detail you cant do anything about)
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:48 PM #3Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:48:16.586000+00:00
Original source
order of procs (from the same proc call) is unspecified (in practice ordered by spell id but thats impl detail you cant do anything about)
Original source
Okay cool so no out of the box way to do what I want.
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:49 PM #4Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:49:19.580000+00:00
Original source
Okay cool so no out of the box way to do what I want.
Original source
but what you can do is chage which proc call is responsible for aura removal
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:52 PM #5Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:52:24.858000+00:00
Original source
but what you can do is chage which proc call is responsible for aura removal
Original source
should be as simple as `UPDATE spell_proc SET SpellTypeMask=0, SpellPhaseMask=0x1 WHERE SpellId=32216;`
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:53 PM #6Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:53:31.829000+00:00
Original source
should be as simple as `UPDATE spell_proc SET SpellTypeMask=0, SpellPhaseMask=0x1 WHERE SpellId=32216;`
Original source
I will test that, thank you for the guidance
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:54 PM #7Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:54:23.859000+00:00
Original source
I will test that, thank you for the guidance
Original source
there is a chance this doesnt work if i forgot about something else
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:56 PM #8Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:56:10.473000+00:00
Original source
there is a chance this doesnt work if i forgot about something else
Original source
but the idea is to move 32216 proc from FINISH to CAST phase
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:56 PM #9Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:56:27.473000+00:00
Original source
but the idea is to move 32216 proc from FINISH to CAST phase
Original source
That makes a lot of sense
rektbyfaith
01-27-2025, 11:56 PM #10Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2025-01-27T23:56:36.047000+00:00
Original source
That makes a lot of sense
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)