[Archive] Model Editing UnNerfed This Maintenance
[Archive] Model Editing UnNerfed This Maintenance
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: It appears Blizzard has removed the function of ignoring ambiguous MPQ files. You may once again load single or multiple MPQ's using the old naming template: "patch-x" without the use of the CFG.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #1Archived author: dalnar • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: It appears Blizzard has removed the function of ignoring ambiguous MPQ files. You may once again load single or multiple MPQ's using the old naming template: "patch-x" without the use of the CFG.
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote:Pics or it never happened.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #2Archived author: Pullefjun • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote:Pics or it never happened.
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: Pics prove nothing as you could pack a bunch of edits into a single mpq anyway.
Try it yourself; Rename your mpq's to the old template, clear your .cfg file and use the exe to open WoW.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #3Archived author: dalnar • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: Pics prove nothing as you could pack a bunch of edits into a single mpq anyway.
Try it yourself; Rename your mpq's to the old template, clear your .cfg file and use the exe to open WoW.
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote:Reported. Wrong forum for discussion.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #4Archived author: merfed • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote:Reported. Wrong forum for discussion.
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: Originally Posted by merfed
Reported. Wrong forum for discussion.
I am not explaining how the new method works, nor am I posting links to the files. I am simply letting everyone know that the "new" method is no longer necessary.
![[Image: lastpost-right.svg]](https://www.ownedcore.com/forums/images/styles/OwnedCoreFX/buttons/lastpost-right.svg)
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #5Archived author: dalnar • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: Originally Posted by merfed
Reported. Wrong forum for discussion.
I am not explaining how the new method works, nor am I posting links to the files. I am simply letting everyone know that the "new" method is no longer necessary.
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote:moved to discussion
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #6Archived author: Fault • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote:moved to discussion
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: Does this work? anyone confirmed this?
Does this mean that you no longer need the wowme thing? just old things?
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #7Archived author: Tyler Durden • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: Does this work? anyone confirmed this?
Does this mean that you no longer need the wowme thing? just old things?
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: Trying right now.
Update: No, it doesnt work, at least my human - ud did not work without the me.
T_T
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #8Archived author: moreniu • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: Trying right now.
Update: No, it doesnt work, at least my human - ud did not work without the me.
T_T
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: Originally Posted by dalnar
It appears Blizzard has removed the function of ignoring ambiguous MPQ files. You may once again load single or multiple MPQ's using the old naming template: "patch-x" without the use of the CFG.
Wait...when could you -not- load ambiguous MPQs? There has long been a problem loading MPQs with m2s in them, but haven't regular old patch-x.mpqs worked as long as they only had blps in them...like forever?
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #9Archived author: trollpaxton • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: Originally Posted by dalnar
It appears Blizzard has removed the function of ignoring ambiguous MPQ files. You may once again load single or multiple MPQ's using the old naming template: "patch-x" without the use of the CFG.
Wait...when could you -not- load ambiguous MPQs? There has long been a problem loading MPQs with m2s in them, but haven't regular old patch-x.mpqs worked as long as they only had blps in them...like forever?
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM
Original source
Quote: I am talking about mpq's with .m2 extensions in them. As long as you name the mpq patch-x, you can open WoW with the force .exe and you will have the patch-x applied. You don't have to put anything in the .cfg file. Which was required before.
As an example, I'm am currently running 4 different mpq files (with m2's) and my .cfg file is blank.
Point being, I bet if someone updated the old ModelEdit.exe for the live version, it would work.
rektbyfaith
11-04-2025, 11:02 AM #10Archived author: dalnar • Posted: 2025-11-04T12:02:04.723822
Original source
Quote: I am talking about mpq's with .m2 extensions in them. As long as you name the mpq patch-x, you can open WoW with the force .exe and you will have the patch-x applied. You don't have to put anything in the .cfg file. Which was required before.
As an example, I'm am currently running 4 different mpq files (with m2's) and my .cfg file is blank.
Point being, I bet if someone updated the old ModelEdit.exe for the live version, it would work.
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)