[DiscordArchive] how come vanilla repacks and stuff dont have the issue?
[DiscordArchive] how come vanilla repacks and stuff dont have the issue?
Original source
how come vanilla repacks and stuff dont have the issue?
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:26 PM #1Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:26:41.894000+00:00
Original source
how come vanilla repacks and stuff dont have the issue?
Original source
naw vanilla seems to have it working fine
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:26 PM #2Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:26:52.928000+00:00
Original source
naw vanilla seems to have it working fine
Original source
Don't know, you'd have to ask the maintainers of those projects, they probably handle it differently than TC and ac
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:27 PM #3Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:27:23.007000+00:00
Original source
Don't know, you'd have to ask the maintainers of those projects, they probably handle it differently than TC and ac
Original source
Well yeah, if they were copies of each other there wouldn't be so many different emulators to choose from based on the expansion.
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:27 PM #4Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:27:45.458000+00:00
Original source
Well yeah, if they were copies of each other there wouldn't be so many different emulators to choose from based on the expansion.
Original source
but in Wotlk resistance were handled differently -
The percentage of magical damage that is mitigated on average is calculated by the following equation (note that this has changed in Wrath):
`Damage reduction percentage = 100% * effective resistance rating / ( K + effective resistance rating )`
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:27 PM #5Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:27:54.259000+00:00
Original source
but in Wotlk resistance were handled differently -
The percentage of magical damage that is mitigated on average is calculated by the following equation (note that this has changed in Wrath):
`Damage reduction percentage = 100% * effective resistance rating / ( K + effective resistance rating )`
Original source
so based on that, it seems like acore is doing a good job of recreating it?
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:28 PM #6Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:28:08.438000+00:00
Original source
so based on that, it seems like acore is doing a good job of recreating it?
Original source
What I'm saying is, resistance shouldn't be handled differently between 3.3.5 and wotlk classic, that's not one of the things on their list of changes
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:29 PM #7Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:29:06.235000+00:00
Original source
What I'm saying is, resistance shouldn't be handled differently between 3.3.5 and wotlk classic, that's not one of the things on their list of changes
Original source
ohhh
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:29 PM #8Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:29:16.888000+00:00
Original source
ohhh
Original source
If it is different, then it's either an issue in ac, or an issue in wotlk classic
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:29 PM #9Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:29:50.333000+00:00
Original source
If it is different, then it's either an issue in ac, or an issue in wotlk classic
Original source
Spells on a target higher level reset damage
Acore - Shadowbolt hit 8 (resist 8)
WotLK - Shadowbolt hit 16
rektbyfaith
07-05-2023, 12:30 PM #10Archived author: Incorporeal • Posted: 2023-07-05T12:30:21.477000+00:00
Original source
Spells on a target higher level reset damage
Acore - Shadowbolt hit 8 (resist 8)
WotLK - Shadowbolt hit 16
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)