[DiscordArchive] should have been a branch?
[DiscordArchive] should have been a branch?
Original source
should have been a branch?
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:37 PM #1Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:37:33.732000+00:00
Original source
should have been a branch?
Original source
Branches tend to require a lot of attention to have all new commits properly merged into them.
Besides, additional things might break in them during that process while little to no work happens on fixing the actual issues when it's barely used.
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:39 PM #2Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:39:35.079000+00:00
Original source
Branches tend to require a lot of attention to have all new commits properly merged into them.
Besides, additional things might break in them during that process while little to no work happens on fixing the actual issues when it's barely used.
Original source
and CC team is working on lot of other things so although it was said that it will be moved to new branch and fixed over time it never happened
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:42 PM #3Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:42:32.079000+00:00
Original source
and CC team is working on lot of other things so although it was said that it will be moved to new branch and fixed over time it never happened
Original source
Be my guest and try ♀️
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:45 PM #4Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:45:24.704000+00:00
Original source
Be my guest and try ♀️
Original source
i dont know why u think it was criticizm ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:47 PM #5Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:47:02.960000+00:00
Original source
i dont know why u think it was criticizm ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Original source
He never said he did
rektbyfaith
07-06-2023, 08:48 PM #6Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-07-06T20:48:06.823000+00:00
Original source
He never said he did
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)