[DiscordArchive] i'll run a clean windows compilation and check. Are you sure that you have clean code?
[DiscordArchive] i'll run a clean windows compilation and check. Are you sure that you have clean code?
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:19:56.177000+00:00
Original source
anyhow
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:20:22.182000+00:00
Original source
I ported boost to AC but I feel there's a slight performance decrease
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:21:21.050000+00:00
Original source
<@248138535968833537> do you have any insight on ace vs boost ? regarding performance
Archived author: Rochet2 • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:21:30.825000+00:00
Original source
no
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:23:22.275000+00:00
Original source
i'll think about pushing it but I have to finish fiddling with it first
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:25:05.720000+00:00
Original source
I just added boost, not hotswap
Archived author: Dany • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:26:55.896000+00:00
Original source
It is but right now the goal is just to test if boost is good enough
Archived author: Rochet2 • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:28:25.927000+00:00
Original source
yes it should be.
Archived author: Rochet2 • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:29:42.891000+00:00
Original source
everything else except gomove.
Gomove maybe if you use an older version that doesnt depend on the new guid system.
Archived author: Yehonal • Posted: 2017-09-18T15:37:06.249000+00:00
Original source
<@269371564187713536> about boost vs ACE, it's my idea:
ACE is the old school of threading/networking library that has been developed 24 years ago and its stability and performances has been always improved. However it's old, such as its documentation and community.
Boost is the new "awesome" full feature framework, more friendly, more modern, bigger community but what i can see is that it's the "work in progress" environment of c++. In fact many stable features from boost has been integrated in c++11, c++17 etc